News

Central District of California granted our Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs

After granting JBB’s Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing a multi-million dollar claim brought by a Dallas-based investment banking firm, Judge Selna of the Federal District Court for the Central District of California granted our Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs, awarding JBB’s client almost $800,000 in fees and costs.  JBB is now moving to register […]

Central District of California granted our Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs Read More »

JBB’s Attorneys Win Arbitration Award in Malibu Real Estate Litigation

The firm received an Arbitration Award on behalf of its client, Contructora Camabuga, a Mexico-based developer that purchased an ocean-view lot in Malibu back in 2010.  Our client alleged that the seller and the real estate agent intentionally concealed facts relating to geotechnical issues known by them which made the lot unbuildable under State, County and

JBB’s Attorneys Win Arbitration Award in Malibu Real Estate Litigation Read More »

JBB Successfully Defends Local Law Firm In Partner Dissociation Arbitration

Ret. Judge Stephen E. Haberfeld of JAMS issued an arbitration award in favor of the firm’s client, Burkhalter, Kessler, Clement & George (BKGG) in a dissociation lawsuit brought by former partner, Eric J. Goodman.  Mr. Goodman sought the recovery of more than $400,000 pursuant to Section 16701 of the California Corporations Code as his “interest”

JBB Successfully Defends Local Law Firm In Partner Dissociation Arbitration Read More »

JBB Law Obtains $4M+ Judgment

Julander, Brown & Bollard just obtained a judgment in the amount of $4,821,659.21 against Chinese manufacturer Yangzhou Jiahe Radiator (together with other Chinese alter-egos) and its U.S. subsidiary, OPL Auto Parts, Inc.  After JBB’s client, California-based Champion Motorsports, Inc., discovered that Yangzhou and OPL were selling its proprietary classic car radiators on eBay, JBB wrote

JBB Law Obtains $4M+ Judgment Read More »

The Case of the Viral Monkey

Apparently, a monkey took a selfie of himself and the picture went viral.  PETA then sued the photographer who published the picture claiming that the monkey’s copyright privileges were infringed.  The District Court granted the photographer’s motion to dismiss on the grounds that PETA did not have standing to sue for the monkey. Subsequently, the

The Case of the Viral Monkey Read More »